Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Inglis
Plaintiffs, Heidi and Kent Happel, appeal the judgment of the circuit court of McHenry County granting summary judgment in favor of defendant, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., and denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint. The court held that defendant had no duty to inform either plaintiff Heidi Happel or her physician that Heidi was potentially fatally allergic to a prescription drug; it also denied plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint to add counts sounding in wilful and wanton misconduct, fraud, and battery. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand the cause.
The following…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Barnett v. Zion Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Frye v. Medicare-Glaser Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992
- Cohen v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Moore Ex Rel. Moore v. Memorial Hosp. of GulfportMississippi Supreme Court · 2002
- Hernandez v. Schering Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2011
- First Mid-Illinois Bank & Trust, N.A. v. ParkerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2010
- Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2003
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.