Legal Opinion
Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided July 2, 2003No. 02 C 7771PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MORAN, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs Heidi Happel and Kent Happel brought this action against defendant Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Pharmacy (Wal-Mart), alleging negligence, loss of society and intentional misconduct. Wal-Mart moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ intentional misconduct claim and moves to strike portions of the complaint. For the following reasons, Wal-Mart’s motion to dismiss is granted and its motion to strike is denied.
BACKGROUND
On August 4,1993, Kent Happel went to a Wal-Mart pharmacy and picked up a prescription of Toradol for his wife…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Greg and Mary Henson v. Csc Credit Services, Trans Union Corporation, and Cosco Federal Credit UnionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
- Happel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Lyon v. Hasbro Industries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Marques v. Federal Reserve Bank of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Suntrust Mortgage, Inc. v. BusbyDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2009
- Schmude v. SheahanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Clark v. BASF Salaried Employees' Pension PlanDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2004