Legal Opinion

Matter of Backus

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 25, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 24, 1904, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to punish the respondent herein for a contempt of court.

Read the full summary

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 24, 1904, which reversed an order of Special Term granting a motion to punish the respondent herein for a contempt of court. The following question was certified : “ Has the Supreme Court, at a Special Term held in the county of Hew York, jurisdiction to punish a judgment debtor as for a contempt in refusing to answer questions and to obey the direction of a referee appointed in proceedings supplementary to execution instituted before a county judge of…

1Opinion of the Court

Order affirmed, with costs, on prevailing opinion below, and question certified answered in the negative.

Concur: Cullen, Cli. J., O’Brien, Martin, Vann and Werner, JJ. Absent: Gray and Haight, JJ.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. John Mulstein Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. Bobrowsky v. BozzutiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. In re Landis Machine Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1909
  4. Aluminum Fabricators, Inc. v. Apex Window Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Cohen v. MannNew York Supreme Court · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API