Lane v. Anchor Casualty Company
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WERLEIN, Justice.
Ernest J. Lane obtained judgment by default against Dan W. Hammons for damages resulting from an automobile collision. Thereafter as a judgment creditoi he brought this suit against appellee, Anchor Casualty Company, under a policy it had issued Hammons. Hammons intervened in the suit. The case was tried before the court without a jury and judgment was rendered in favor of appellee. Only Lane has appealed from the judgment.
Since the record contains no findings of fact or conclusions of law by the trial court, the trial court’s judgment implies all necessary fact findings in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Klein v. Century LloydsTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. HamblenTexas Supreme Court · 1945
- Allen v. Western Alliance Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company v. BournCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- J. B. McPherson and James W. McPherson v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- Cowley v. Texas Snubbing Control, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1992
- Broussard v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Westbrook v. Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.