Legal Opinion
Seiden v. Nicholson
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided January 30, 1976No. 74 C 3117PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ROBSON, Senior District Judge.
This cause is before the court on the plaintiffs’ motion for a class action determination pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons hereinafter stated, this motion shall be granted as to all of the plaintiffs’ . claims under consideration here except the common law fraud claim alleged in Count Y of the First Consolidated and Amended Complaint. This court determines that henceforth Messrs. Robert S. Bassman, Murray Seiden, Seymour Trager and Marshall Weinstein shall be the sole representatives of the class.
The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Green v. Wolf Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Ross v. A. H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Peil v. SpeiserCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,173 Michael Susman v. Lincoln American Corp., Ann Flamm and Arnold Flamm v. Rudolph Eberstadt, Jr. And Microdot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Charles E. Wagner, for Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Reese H. Taylor, Jr., Chairman, Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Riordan v. BarneyDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1986
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.