Legal Opinion

Moyer v. Kline

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County

Decided March 30, 1955No. 44Published

1Opinion of the Court

Biester, P. J.,

The above matter is before us as the result of preliminary objections to the complaint in assumpsit.

Defendant contends that plaintiff has failed to aver that the contract upon which he seeks recovery is an oral or written contract, and in the event it is the latter, has failed to attach a copy of it. Defendant also filed a preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer, arguing that, in its present form, the complaint fails to set forth a cause of action.

This is a suit seeking to recover real estate broker’s commissions. The complaint avers that, on July 27, 1950, Leo W.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clark v. Prov. Tr. Co., TrusteeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Tice v. EasterdaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  3. Black Co. v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Matuszewski v. GrisiusSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Kline v. LapidaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API