Legal Opinion

Kline v. Lapida

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 17, 1952No. Appeal, 11PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Gunther, J.,

Emanuel Kline, a real estate broker, instituted suit in assumpsit against Ida Lapida, appellant, to recover a broker’s commission, averring that he had produced a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy defendant’s property on defendant’s terms and that defendant wrongfully refused to sign an agreement of sale. After the court below refused a nonsuit, defendant offered no evidence but moved for a directed verdict, which was refused. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $305. Defendant thereupon filed motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. which…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. KimmellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. S. V. Thompson Co. v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Real Estate Co. v. CavazzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  2. Wilkinsburg Real Estate & Trust Co. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Moyer v. Kline, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1955
  4. WILKINSBURG REAL EST. & TR. CO. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API