Kline v. Lapida
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Gunther, J.,
Emanuel Kline, a real estate broker, instituted suit in assumpsit against Ida Lapida, appellant, to recover a broker’s commission, averring that he had produced a purchaser ready, willing and able to buy defendant’s property on defendant’s terms and that defendant wrongfully refused to sign an agreement of sale. After the court below refused a nonsuit, defendant offered no evidence but moved for a directed verdict, which was refused. A jury returned a verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $305. Defendant thereupon filed motions for a new trial and judgment n.o.v. which…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McDonald v. KimmellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- S. V. Thompson Co. v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Real Estate Co. v. CavazzaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Wilkinsburg Real Estate & Trust Co. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
- Moyer v. Kline, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1955
- WILKINSBURG REAL EST. & TR. CO. v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953