Legal Opinion
Schiller v. Cosmopolitan Mutual Casualty Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 23, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCharles Margett, J.
Cosmopolitan Mutual Casualty Company of New York (hereinafter referred to as “ Cosmopolitan ”) issued to Frank Schiller (hereinafter referred to as the “insured”) a motor vehicle liability policy containing an indorsement providing benefits up to the sum of $10,000, on account of bodily injury or death caused by uninsured automobiles. Said indorsement provides in pertinent part as follows:
“ 1. Damages for Injuries or Death Caused by Uninsured Automobile.
“ To pay all sums which the insured shall be legally entitled to recover as damages from the owner or operator of an uninsured automobile…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Riverdale Fabrics Corp. & Tillinghast-Stiles Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Matter of Lehman v. OstrovskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Matter of Delmar Box Co.(ætna Ins. Co.)New York Court of Appeals · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- In re the Arbitration between Spectrum Fabrics Corp. & Main Street Fashions, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Windsor Mills, Inc. v. Collins & Aikman Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1972
- Merchants Mutual Casualty Co. v. WildmanNew York Supreme Court · 1960