Legal Opinion

Spivack v. Hara

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 17, 1966No. Gen. 50,467PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schwartz

In this action for indemnity by one tortfeasor against another, judgment was entered for defendant on his motion to strike the complaint and dismiss the cause. The parties to this case were codefendants in an action brought by one Lenore Willens, who had been a passenger in the car of Hara when it was involved in a collision with Spivack’s car. She charged Hara with wilful and wanton misconduct, as was required to make her case under the guest statute, and alleged negligence on the part of Spivack. Judgment was entered on verdict against both men for $25,000. This judgment was satisfied by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schneiderman v. Interstate Transit Lines, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. John Griffiths & Son Co. v. National Fireproofing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. Arthur Dixon Transfer Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1951
  4. Moroni v. Intrusion-Prepakt, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1960
  5. Bohannon v. Joseph T. Ryerson and Sons, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Ziarko v. Soo Line RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Scott Davis, Plaintiff-Cross-Appellee, Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Cross-Appellant, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Conklin v. HornerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Sargent v. Interstate Bakeries, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1967
  5. Lundy v. Whiting Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API