Hunnicutt v. State

Counsel for the defendant insists that there was not sufficient evidence to authorize the judge, trying the case without a jury, to find the defendant guilty of vagrancy, and, as the defendant was a married woman and it was not shown that her husband was “unable to support her,” she can not be convicted of vagrancy in violation of section 26-7001 of the Code.

The defendant, although she said that she was married to one Cecil Garrison and that he gave her $15 per week for her support, stated that she “went under the name of Anne Hunnicutt because we have been separated several times.” There was…