Legal Opinion

Forrester v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 24, 1933No. 22781PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.

The two counts of the accusation charged the defendant with committing the offense of vagrancy by two different methods; the first charging in part that the defendant “led an idle, immoral, and profligate life,” and the second charging in part that the defendant had “no visible or known means of a fair, honest, and reputable livelihood.” The trial resulted in a verdict of guilty. The defendant made a motion for a new trial, which was overruled; and on this judgment the defendant assigns error.

In addition to proving the defendant guilty of basely immoral conduct, the State proved that a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tooke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  2. Simmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  3. Welborn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Black v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  2. Hunnicutt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1944
  3. McDuffie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  4. Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API