Legal Opinion
Keuffel & Esser Co. v. Charles Bruning Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided June 21, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 736-62Published
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
Of this patent infringement action, brought under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271 and 281, jurisdiction is conferred on this Court by 28 U.S.C. § 1338.
The patent alleged to be infringed is United States Patent No. 3,028,240 (’240) issued April 3, 1962, upon application filed January 15, 1959, to Georg Werner and Gottlieb von Poser, assignors of the plaintiff, Keuffel & Esser Company (K&E). The defendant, Charles Bruning Company, Inc. (Bruning), has moved for summary judg*196ment in accordance with F.R.Civ.P. 56(b), declaring invalid claims 1 to 5 inclusive, of the patent in suit. In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Application of Harold G. Petering and Harry H. FallCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
- Dewey & Almy Chemical Co. v. Mimex Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- F.A.R. Liquidating Corp. v. Brownell, Atty. GenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Esnault-PelterieSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.