Legal Opinion

Quality Performance Lines v. Yoho Automotive, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 28, 1980No. 16101PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Defendant appeals the decision of the lower court following a trial without jury. We remand to the trial court for judgment in accordance with this opinion. We reverse in part, and remand with instructions. Costs to defendant. All statutory references are to Utah Code Annotated, 1953.

Quality Performance Lines, the plaintiff in this action (hereinafter referred to as Quality), rebuilds and sells automotive components. One of Quality’s customers between 1966 and early 1975 was the defendant, Yoho Automotive, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Yoho), a warehouse distributor. Yoho…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Corenswet, Inc. v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  2. Morgan v. Board of State LandsUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gleason v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Morton Thiokol, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1991
  2. East Hill Marine, Inc. v. Rinker Boat Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2007
  3. Continental Casing Corp. v. Siderca Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001
  4. Sally Beauty Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Nexxus Products Company, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  5. Paulson, Inc. v. Bromar, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API