LePage v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KITE, Justice.
[¶1] This case raises the fundamental question of whether the language of Wyo. Stat. Aun. § 21-4-309(a) (LEXIS 1999) mandates the issuance of an exemption from immunization for schoolchildren upon a written religious objection or whether it permits an inquiry by the Department of Health into the sincerity of the religious beliefs of an applicant. We hold that the Department of Health exceeded its statutory authority by applying the statute inconsistently with its clear and unambiguous language. Our holding is based on the premise that the language of § 21-4-809(a) is mandatory.
[¶…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Thomson v. Wyoming In-Stream Flow CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
- Worker's Compensation Claim of French v. Amax Coal WestWyoming Supreme Court · 1998
- Worker's Compensation Claim of Olheiser v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Cathcart v. MeyerWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Worcester v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Mayland v. FlitnerWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
- Hanson v. BelvealWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.