Legal Opinion

Partin v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided April 7, 1959No. 4718PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.

The store in which the plaintiff was injured was described by her counsel as a “small A & P superette,” in which customers followed a U-shaped course in making self-service purchases. Situated on the right of the righthand aisle were a produce department, a refrigerator where ice cream was apparently kept, a soap rack, and a meat department.

The plaintiff, who was the only witness to testify at the trial, stated that she entered the store to make purchases, and traveled along the righthand aisle pushing a cart. As she entered the aisle she observed an employee of the store “carrying a basket…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goddard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  2. Norton v. HudnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
  4. Hudson v. F. W. Woodworth Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Hite v. Maritime Overseas CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1974
  3. Rallis v. Demoulas Super Markets, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. Robinson v. Fort Dodge Limestone Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  5. Pamela A. MacLean v. Parkwood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API