Legal Opinion

Lindsay Manufacturing Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1997No. 96-1282, 96-1440PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAGILL, Circuit Judge.

Lindsay Manufacturing Company (Lindsay) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment to Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company and the Hartford Insurance Company of Illinois (collectively, Hart ford) on Lindsay’s claim and Hartford’s restitution counterclaim arising out of insurance coverage for environmental cleanup costs. Lindsay argues that the district court erred in holding that, under Nebraska law, the “as damages” language in a comprehensive general liability (CGL) insurance policy does not include environmental response costs. We reverse and remand.

I

Linds…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Cheney v. Bell National Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. Robin v. Blue Cross Hospital Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  4. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics Corporation, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company v. General Dynamics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  5. A. Johnson & Co., Inc., and A. Johnson Energy Marketing, Inc. v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kiewit Diversified Group Inc. v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
  2. Lindsay Manufacturing Company v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. Hartford Insurance Company, of Illinois, Dekalb Energy Company, a Corporation, Lindsay Manufacturing Company v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. Hartford Insurance Company, of Illinois, Dekalb Energy Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API