Legal Opinion
Parker v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 14, 1983No. Civ. A. 79-0158, 80-2626 and 81-0266PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
HAROLD H. GREENE, District Judge.
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company (“B & 0”), one of two defendants in these consolidated “reverse discrimination” cases, has moved to compel production of several tape recordings that the plaintiff allegedly made of telephone conversations between himself and other B & 0 employees. The plaintiff, a citizen of Maryland, points to a Maryland statute that makes it a felony electronically to record a telephone conversation without the consent of all the parties. See Md.Cts. and Jud.Proc.Code Ann. § 10-402. He asserts that compelled disclosure of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Maness v. MeyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Rennie v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Prouty v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Bootz v. ChildsDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
- Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Parker v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
- Breuder v. Board of Trustees of Community College District No. 502, DuPage County, IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021