Legal Opinion
Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 27, 1985No. 78 Civ. 1713PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GAGLIARDI, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiffs commenced this action against Ogilvy & Mather, Inc. (“0 & M”), an advertising agency, alleging employment discrimination based on sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (“Title VII”). The case was tried without a jury from October 3,1983, through November 15, 1983. In its opinion, Rossini v. Ogilvy & Mather, Inc., 597 F.Supp. 1120 (S.D.N.Y.1984), the court discussed but did not rule on the claim of salary discrimination. This decision constitutes the court’s findings of fact and conelusions of…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United Air Lines, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Hazelwood School District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Cooper v. Federal Reserve Bank of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Trout v. GarrettDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1991