Legal Opinion

Hanover Insurance v. Fasching

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 17, 2001No. 99-P-10PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This appeal concerns the interpretation of a standard Massachusetts automobile insurance policy. At issue is whether, under a policy providing an insured with compulsory insurance for bodily injury to others, the insurer is required to pay for such injuries caused by its insured’s operation of a vehicle owned by a third party and not specifically listed on the policy.

In 1993, David Ruggiano owned a 1983 GMC pick-up truck that was listed on the standard Massachusetts Automobile Insurance Policy (Sixth Edition) he had purchased from Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover). Ruggiano’s insurance…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cody v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Belleville Industries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Bilodeau v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  4. Ruggerio Ambulance Service, Inc. v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. Save-Mor Supermarkets, Inc. v. Skelly Detective Service, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mahoney v. American Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013
  2. Mahoney v. American Automobile InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API