Roofing & Sheet Metal Supply Co. of Tulsa v. Golzar-Nejad Khalil, Inc.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice:
The question is whether the Plaintiff, a subeontractor/supplier of roofing materials, has a valid hen for supphes used in repair of Defendants’ building. We find that Plaintiff has been more than paid for henable materials it furnished, and reverse the lower court’s judgment foreclosing hen and awarding attorney fees. A novel question of law is involved.
Roofing and Sheet Metal Supply Co. Of Tulsa, Inc. (Suppher) is the plaintiff. Golzar-Nejad Khalil, Inc., owner of a business known as “Carpet City”, is the landowner and Defendant (Owner or Carpet City). Owner contracted with…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Burk v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Ryndak v. SeawellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1904
- De Bolt v. Farmers' Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- McGlumphy v. Jetero Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- North Texas Production Credit Ass'n v. McCurtain County National BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- GRP of Texas, Inc. v. Eateries, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Stevens v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Jones v. Purcell Investments, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2009
- Meredith v. SmithCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001