Legal Opinion

Martin, S. v. Burchinal, L.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 22, 2021No. 929 WDA 2020Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

J-A09020-21 NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 SCOTT S. MARTIN AND JANEL G. : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MARTIN, HUSBAND AND WIFE, AND : PENNSYLVANIA DAVID C. BALSEGA AND MICHELLE M. : BALSEGA, HUSBAND AND WIFE : : v. : : LUTHER BURCHINAL, A/K/A L.W. : BURCHINAL AND EMMA BURCHINAL, : HUSBAND AND WIFE; AND JOSEPH G. : BURCHINAL AND SARAH ELIZABETH : BURCHINAL, HUSBAND AND WIFE; : THEIR HEIRS; SUCCESSORS AND : ASSIGNS; : AND LAWRENCE KRUPA; AND : LAWRENCE L. KRUPA; LAWRENCE L. : KRUPA, JR.; BRIAN J. KRUPA; AND : MARK A. KRUPA : : APPEAL OF: LAWRENCE L. KRUPA, : LAWRENCE…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Rahn v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  5. In Re Administrative Order No. 1-Md-2003Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API