Legal Opinion · Dissent

Blust v. Sisters of Mercy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1931No. Docket No. 80, Calendar No. 35,744Published

1DissentPotter, J.

Plaintiff presented a claim for compensation against the Sisters of Mercy, Grand Rapids, Michigan, and the Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company. From an order denying compensation she appeals. August 26, 1927, plaintiff made application to become a member of the Sisters of Mercy, of Mt. Mercy College and Academy, at Grand Rapids, Michigan. She was tentatively accepted and began a probationary period, divided into three stages: postulate stage; novitiate, stage; and white sister stage. From August 26, 1927, to April 24, 1928, petitioner was a postulate, and from April 24, 1928, to April 24,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Bernstein v. . Beth Israel HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  2. Jahn's Admr. v. Wm. H. McKnight & Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  3. Van Sweden v. Van SwedenMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Employers Indemnity Co. v. Kelly Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. FronkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API