Cupp v. Alberto-Culver USA, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS OF DEFENDANT L’ORÉAL S.A.
DONALD, District Judge.
Before the Court is the motion of L’Oréal S.A. (“Defendant”) to dismiss the complaint of Billy Cupp (“Cupp”) and Cathy R. Craig (“Craig”) d/b/a/ Looks Salon (“Plaintiff’) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), 12(b)(5), and 12(b)(6). The Court finds that Plaintiff failed to show personal jurisdiction over Defendant and grants Defendant’s motion to dismiss.
I. Factual Background 1
L’Oréal S.A. is a French corporation, with its registered office in Paris, France and its corporate headquarters and…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Rush v. SavchukSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harris v. NGK North American, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Feild v. GRAFFAGNINODistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2007
- Sibley v. Alcan, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005
- American Copper & Brass, Inc. v. Mueller Europe, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Johnson v. BLC Lexington SNF, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019