Legal Opinion

United States v. Jorge Compres-Paulino

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 17, 2004No. Docket 04-1588PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

The question posed to us on this appeal is the significance to United States Sentencing Guideline § 2L1.2(b)(l) of a deportation and an illegal reentry that intervene between conviction for a drug trafficking crime punished by a sentence of parole and a later revocation of that parole followed by assignment of a prison term exceeding thirteen months. While nominally a novel issue for this Circuit, we find that our decisions in United States v. Leiva-Deras, 359 F.3d 183 (2d Cir.2004), and United States v. Huerta-Moran, 352 F.3d 766 (2d Cir.2003), support affirmance of the District Court’s…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Alabama v. SheltonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. United States v. Tyshea Mincey, Also Known as Tyshea Ferrell, and Deshawn Ferrell, Also Known as Barry ShawnCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. FanfanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Bustillos-PenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. LopezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  3. United States v. Virginio MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Rosales-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  5. United States v. Martin Franco-GalvanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API