Legal Opinion
United States v. Virginio Martinez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 15, 2017No. 17-50026PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IKUTA, Circuit Judge:
Virginio Hernandez Martinez pleaded guilty to illegal reentry in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. At sentencing, the district court applied an eight-level enhancement under § 2L1.2(b)(2)(B) of the 2016 United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”). 1 This enhancement is applicable “[i]f, before the defendant was ordered deported or ordered removed from the United States for the first time, the defendant sustained ... a conviction for a felony offense (other than an illegal reentry offense) for which the sentence imposed was two years or more.” U.S.S.G. §…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Gall v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mead Corp. v. TilleySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Munoz-CamarenaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. Ruslan KirilyukCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Michael BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- United States v. Jose Valencia-MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. James HerreraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Vicente Cuevas-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.