Legal Opinion

Esposito v. Quatinez

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 5, 2014No. 09 CV 0421(DRH)(GRB)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

HURLEY, Senior District Judge:

Plaintiff Amelia Esposito (“plaintiff’ or “Esposito”) was involuntarily committed the psychiatric unit of Stony Brook University Hospital (“SBUH”) from February 2, 2008 to March 6, 2008 pursuant to New York State Mental Hygiene Law (“MHL”). During her hospitalization, plaintiff received care from attending physician Dr. *409Laura Fochtmann (“Fochtmann”) as well as Dr. Lara Quatinez (“Quatinez”), (collectively “defendants”1).

On October 13, 2010, plaintiff filed a Third Amended Complaint (“Amend. Compl.”), the operative pleading in this action,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Youngberg v. Romeo Ex Rel. RomeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eze v. ScottDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  2. Lurch, Jr. v. Chaput, MDDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API