Legal Opinion

Estate of Childs

California Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1941No. L. A. No. 17435PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

18 Cal.2d 237 (1941)

Estate of EMELINE CHILDS, Deceased. EMELINE CHILDS DWIGHT et al., Appellants,

v.

HARRY B. RILEY, as State Controller, etc., Respondent.

L. A. No. 17435.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

July 16, 1941.

Burr & Smith and A. J. Cathcart for Appellants.

James W. Hickey, Inheritance Tax Attorney, and Raymond G. LaNoue, Assistant Inheritance Tax Attorney, for Respondent.

CARTER, J.

This appeal presents a controversy in relation to the rate and method of computation of the inheritance tax payable by reason of property transfers to appellants at death and prior thereto designed to take…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hewlings v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Perkins Manufacturing Co. v. Clinton Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Dwight v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Carter v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. People v. Lance W.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. EscobarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Lucas v. HandcockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  4. Kirkwood v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. People v. LitmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API