Legal Opinion

Shpack v. Baretti

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided November 1, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtArthur E. Blyn, J.

This is a submission on an agreed state: ment of facts. It involves a suit by the plaintiff for a contingent payment, pursuant to an agreement executed by the parties relating to the discovery and recovery of certain assets of whose existence the defendant had no knowledge.

It is agreed that the value of the assets is $1,986. The contingent payment agreement provided that the plaintiff was to receive one third of the value of any assets recovered on behalf of the defendant. The defendant refused to pay the plaintiff the sum of $662 which represents one third of the value of the discovered…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Shorten v. MilbankNew York Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Shorten v. MilbankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Landi v. ArkulesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  2. Webster Associates v. Town of WebsterNew York Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. RichyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API