Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Frazer v. Seibel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 1, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

LAMM, C. J.'

The three cases entitled as above are original proceedings in mandamus. They have a common purpose, were heard as one and decided as one *222by a per curiam handed down on October 31, 1914. If fresh justice is the sweetest as Lord Bacon says it is, that per curiam filled the bill. It, inter alia, ordered that absolute writs issue and that an opinion follow. The opinion so ordered to follow, follows, thus:

The object of the alternative writs was to cite Seibel, clerk of the county court of St. Louis county (who was either recalcitrant, or dubitante, or both) to show cause, if any he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nance v. KearbeySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Punch v. KortjohnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Schmoll v. DrabelleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  4. Williams v. DalrympleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Black v. Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  2. State ex rel. Haller v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
  3. State Ex Rel. Huse v. HadenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
  4. State Ex Rel. Preisler v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. State ex rel. Clark v. KleneMissouri Court of Appeals · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API