Legal Opinion

Bicknell v. Comstock

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 1885No. 1247PublishedCited by 41 opinions

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW’ YORK. This was an action to recover the consideration paid for a tract of land in Iowa, and the value of the improvements thereon, brought by defendant in error, as plaintiff" below, against the plaintiff in error as defendant.

Read the full summary

IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW’ YORK. This was an action to recover the consideration paid for a tract of land in Iowa, and the value of the improvements thereon, brought by defendant in error, as plaintiff" below, against the plaintiff in error as defendant. The complaint alleged a conveyance by Bicknell to one Bennett, the subsequent transfer to the defendant by sundry mesne conveyances ; valuable improvements on the premises made by Bennett and his grantees; and a failure of.title in Bicknell when the deed was made, by reason of a…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

This is a writ of error to the Circuit Court for the Eastern District of New York.

The action is for a breach of covenants of warranty in a conveyance of land located in Iowa. It is a manifest attempt to obtain the judgment of this court on one of the complicated phases of the disputed titles growing out of the grants of lands on the Des Moines River to aid in improving the navigation of that river, and in constructing railroads through these lands, with a strong probability of the absence and ignorance of this suit, on the part of all the persons really interested in the questions here raised.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. United States v. SchurzSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Leffingwell v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1862
  4. Croxall v. ShererdSupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Lightfoot v. . DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  3. Michigan Land & Lumber Co. v. RustSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Parkersburg Industrial Co. v. SchultzWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API