Legal Opinion

Heilig v. Christensen

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided February 26, 1975No. 7665PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Petitioner Myron F. Heilig seeks in these original proceedings the issuance of a writ of mandamus and a writ of prohibition or in the alternative a writ of certiorari to relieve him from complying with the order of the court below that confirmed an arbitrator’s award dissolving and settling a certain partnership between Heilig and his partners, Respondents Weiss and Shul-man.

1. In 1966, Heilig, Weiss, and Shulman entered into a partnership agreement for the purchase and operation of 113 apartment buildings in Las Vegas. They each signed, as part of the purchase contract, promissory…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowler v. First Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 1951
  2. United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of the Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry, Local Union No. 525 v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  3. State Ex Rel. Newitt v. Fourth Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of ElkoNevada Supreme Court · 1942

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pan v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Ashokan v. State, Department of InsuranceNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Pan v. Dist. Ct.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Hickey v. Eighth Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Ham v. EIGHTH JUDICIAL DIST. COURT, ETC.Nevada Supreme Court · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API