Legal Opinion
In re E. S. N.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided March 29, 1982No. 81-564PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant Samuel N. father of E. S. N., challenges an order of the Family Division of Superior Court which terminated his parental rights. He contends that (1) certain statutory provisions regarding notice were violated, and (2) the method of service violated due process of law. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
In November 1974, appellant placed E. S. N. in emergency foster care with the Department of Human Services (DHS). At that time, E. S. N.’s mother was incarcerated and appellant was about to be returned to prison. E. S. N. was then two years old.
Subsequent to the foster care placement, a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Quilloin v. WalcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Appeal of H.R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- In Re Antj. P.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In re T.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re N.N.N.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Spevacek v. WrightDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.