Legal Opinion

Matter of King

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided October 22, 1991No. C0-91-1032PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

This appeal presents an issue of first impression for Minnesota’s appellate courts. 1 Under what circumstances can trial courts involuntarily place a mentally ill patient, not committed as mentally ill and dangerous, at the state security hospital? 2

FACTS

In 1988, appellant was transferred administratively from Anoka-Metro Regional Treatment Center to the Minnesota Security Hospital at St. Peter. 3 The record indicates appellant was previously admitted to the security hospital in 1983, 1985 and 1986. In proceedings not a part of the present record, he was committed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re the Welfare of HofmasterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
  2. Matter of DanielsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  3. Welfare of MDA v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. In Re LufskyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of KellorCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Matter of GrafstromCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
  3. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Michael Alvin Edgar Krengel.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API