Legal Opinion

Searcy v. Patriot & Barkworks Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 7582PublishedCited by 11 opinions

From the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this case, the only question for decision in this court is this: Are the facts stated in the complaint of the appellants, the plaintiffs below, sufficient to constitute a cause of action in their favor and against the appellees ?

The appellants’ complaint, in this case, is so exceedingly long, that we will not attempt to give a summary even of all its allegations in this opinion. We will, however, state as briefly as we can the material and controlling facts, alleged in the complaint as constituting the appellants’ supposed cause of action. This suit was commenced on the 31st day of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Columbus, Chicago & Indiana Central R. W. Co. v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Marion Township Gravel Road Co. v. SleethIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. State, ex rel. Monroe Gravel Road Co. v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Marion & Monroe Gravel Road Co. v. McClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  5. Webb v. Brandywine Junction Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Langever v. MillerTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  2. State ex rel. Howell v. WildesNevada Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Bailey v. MenzieIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Bruce v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. State Ex Rel. Mta v. Ind. Rev. Bd.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API