Coleman v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ACREE, Chief Judge:
The narrow issue presented is whether either, or both, of the appellants, Dexter Coleman and Mark Cantrell, is entitled to qualified official immunity. We find Cantrell engaged in a discretionary act and, as a result, may qualify for official immunity. With respect to Coleman, we find he failed to comply with a ministerial directive but, because a genuine issue of material fact exists, summary judgment was premature. Accordingly, for the following reasons, we reverse the circuit court’s June 28, 2011 order denying appellants’ motion for summary judgment on immunity…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Scifres v. KraftCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1996
- Yanero v. DavisKentucky Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowan County v. SloasKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Breathitt County Board of Education v. PraterKentucky Supreme Court · 2009
- Upchurch v. Clinton CountyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1959
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sours ex rel. Estate of Sours v. Big Sandy Regional Jail AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2013
- Lowe's Feed and Grain, Inc. v. Charles "Rick" Maxwell, IndividuallyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
- Warner v. Midnight Recovery,IncDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2020