Legal Opinion

Warner v. Midnight Recovery,Inc

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 6, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00453Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION JILIANNE WARNER Plaintiff v. Case No. 3:19-cv-00453-RGJ MIDNIGHT RECOVERY, INC., ET AL. Defendants * * * * * MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Jilianne Warner’s (“Warner”) moves to remand [DE 6] based on the involuntary dismissal of non-diverse defendants. GEICO responded, and the matter is ripe. [DE 7, Resp.; DE 10, Reply]. For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Warner’s Motion to Remand. I. BACKGROUND A. Factual background On December 29, 2017, a tow truck owned by defendant Midnight Recovery, Inc. and…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Wilson v. Republic Iron & Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Stephen B. Batoff, ph.d. v. State Farm Insurance Company, Leonard M. Paul, ed.dCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  4. Triggs v. John Crump Toyota, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Leroy Alexander v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation James Jeros Steven Brechtelsbauer Jane DoeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API