Legal Opinion

Simpson v. Eardley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 19, 1911PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Dimmit County; J. E. Mullally, Judge. Action by J. N. Simpson against Albert Eardley. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtJames, C. J.

The amended petition of appellant alleged that on April 19, 1909, Eardley employed him to find a purchaser able, ready, and willing to buy the latter’s land, about 4,000 acres; that it was agreed that plaintiff should have the exclusive agency for 20 days from said date to find such purchaser, and that defendant would not sell the land during that time, at $15 per acre, one-third in cash upon the delivery of the deed and the balance on time to suit the purchaser, to be evidenced by notes bearing 6 per cent interest from date; that defendant agreed to execute to such purchaser a good title…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Houston & Texas Central Railroad v. KeelingTexas Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Moss & Raley v. WrenTexas Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Bourland v. HuffhinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Huffhines v. BourlandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. California Land Security Co. v. RitchieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Carter v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  5. Middleton v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API