Legal Opinion

Shoulty v. Miller ex rel. Miller

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1849PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Delaware Circuit Court

1Opinion of the Court

Perkins, J. —

Case for slander and malicious prosecution. Accusation complained of, larceny. Pleas, justification; issues of fact. Verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

The Court, upon the trial, instructed the jury that the pleas of justification, averring the truth of the charge, must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt. This was right. Lanter v. McEwen, 8 Blackf. 495.—Wonderly v. Nokes, id. 589, and note.

The Court also instructed that the filing of a plea of justification, where any evidence was given under it, was not, of itself, a fact that should aggravate the damages. This instruction…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Byrket v. MonohonIndiana Supreme Court · 1844
  2. Lanter v. M'EwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1847
  3. Wasson v. CanfieldIndiana Supreme Court · 1843

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fowler v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kinyon v. PalmerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1865
  3. Tucker v. CallIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Hallowell v. GuntleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wilson v. BarnettIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API