Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Brown

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 28, 1983No. Civ. 63658PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WISOT, J. *

PACTS

Plaintiff brought suit against a former employer as an individual and against the corporation principally owned and managed by him, charging wrongful interference with prospective employment. Her complaint sought recovery under two separate causes of action: she alleged slander, and sought compensatory and punitive damages; she also invoked the civil action authorized by Labor Code sections 1050 1 and 1054, 2 and sought treble damages under the latter statute. Both causes of action were based on statements of defendant Brown relayed to plaintiff by means of a letter…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Hale v. MorganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
  4. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Leipert v. HonoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Wage & Hour LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2007
  2. Fassberg Construction Co. v. Housing AuthorityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Randi W. v. Muroc Joint Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Hasso v. HapkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile Estates Homeowners Ass'n v. De Anza Santa Cruz Mobile EstatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API