Legal Opinion
State v. Knowles
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided June 12, 1998No. 20834-2-IIPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
— Veryl Edward Knowles challenges his conviction for intimidating a judge under RCW 9A.72.160, arguing that the statute is unconstitutionally overbroad. Finding that it is not, we affirm.
FACTS
Between December 1995 and March 1996, Veryl Edward Knowles appeared in court as a defendant in various criminal matters in Kitsap County Superior Court before Judges Karen B. Conoley, Leonard W Kruse, M. Karlynn Haberly, and Leonard W Costello. During those proceedings, he sent letters, filed documents, and made statements to each judge, stating his intent to file hens on the judges’ properties if they…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cornelius v. NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- State v. J.M.Washington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. WilliamsWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. KilburnWashington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. SullivanWashington Supreme Court · 2001
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.