Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1913No. 7,838PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom Sullivan Circuit Court; Charles E. Henderson, Judge. Action by Ray Q. Newsom against the Chicago and Eastern Illinois Railroad Company. Prom a judgment for defendant, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.

This action was brought by appellant against appellee to recover damages for his wrongful expulsion from one of appellee’s passenger trains, and alleged unlawful arrest and imprisonment. The complaint was in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer was overruled. Answer in general denial. Trial, finding and judgment for appellee. Appellant’s motion for a new trial was overruled, and this ruling is the only error assigned.

1. The reasons for a new trial are: (1) The verdict of the jury is contrary to law. (2) The verdict of the jury is contrary to the evidence. (3) -The verdict of the jury…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Malott v. HawkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Inland Steel Co. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Board of Commissioners v. GibsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. EbaughIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Patterson v. State BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Roach v. Cumberland BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Ogle v. ColbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API