Legal Opinion

Burke v. Middlesworth

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 29, 1931No. 13,920PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridwell, J.

The appellee brought her action against the appellant to recover damages. The case was tried upon the issues joined on an amended second paragraph of complaint, alleging assault and battery, and the third paragraph of complaint alleging seduction. The defendant’s answer is in two paragraphs, the first a general denial, the other a plea of settlement.' A reply in general denial was filed to the second paragraph of defendant’s answer. Upon the issues thus joined, the case was submitted to a jury for trial, resulting in a verdict for the appellee in the sum of $8,000. Appellant filed his motion…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HilligossIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Gunder v. TibbitsIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Board of Commissioners v. LeggIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Beatty v. BrummettIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Marshall v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. 409 Land Trust v. City of South BendIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Seamons v. SpackmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Forker v. BerkesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
  4. Department of Public Welfare v. CouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Art Mosaic & Tile Co. v. St. ClairIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API