Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1998No. 1997-2725PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 82 Ohio St.3d 100.] OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. BOYKIN. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin,

1998-Ohio-581.] Attorneys at law—Misconduct—Indefinite suspension—Engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice—Engaging in conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law—Neglect of an entrusted legal matter— Failing to preserve identity of funds and property of a client—Failing to promptly pay or deliver to client funds the client is entitled to receive— Failing to cooperate in disciplinary…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. VerbiskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cuyahoga Cty. Bar Assn. v. CurryOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. FarahOhio Supreme Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API