Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Boykin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. 92-1328PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Having reviewed the record, we concur in the board’s findings of misconduct and its recommendation. Therefore, we order that Leroy Reuben Boykin be suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of eighteen months; however, imposition of this sanction is stayed on the conditions established by the panel and adopted by the board. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., and Wright, J., dissent and would indefinitely suspend respondent.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BoykinOhio Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Toledo Bar Assn. v. FarahOhio Supreme Court · 2010