Field v. Volkswagenwerk AG
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentSeitz, Chief Judge
I agree with the majority that Ivana’s presence as a plaintiff destroyed the complete diversity necessary for the district court’s jurisdiction. I also agree that the citizenship of Arthur’s estate is that of the administratrix rather than of the deceased. However, I am constrained to disagree with the majority’s disposition of two issues: the holding that Ivana in her individual capacity is not an indispensable party and the holding that the complaint may not be amended to substitute Lucille as the administratrix of Arthur’s estate.
I
On the first issue the majority correctly holds that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Anderson v. WattSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- McSparran v. WeistCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Plouffe v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
- Roosevelt Moore v. Coats Company and Jack P. Hennessy Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.