Legal Opinion

Rubenstein v. Siokas

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 10, 2020No. 1:19-cv-06976Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARK RUBENSTEIN, Plaintiff, -v.- 19 Civ. 6976 (KPF) COSMOS HOLDINGS, INC., OPINION AND ORDER Nominal Defendant, -and- GRIGORIOS SIOKAS, Defendant. KATHERINE POLK FAILLA, District Judge: Plaintiff Mark Rubenstein brings this action pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “1934 Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), on behalf of nominal defendant Cosmos Holdings, Inc. (“Cosmos”). He alleges that Defendant Grigorios Siokas, an officer, director, and beneficial owner of more than 10% of Cosmos, violated the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Harris v. MillsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  4. Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API