Legal Opinion

Hereford v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 24, 1964No. 37002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, judge.

The offense is murder; the punishment, ten (10) years confinement in the state penitentiary.

In view of our disposition of the case, a recitation of the facts is unnecessary.

Appellant contends that the trial court erred in interpreting the verdict of the jury which found appellant guilty “as charged in the indictment and assessed his punishment at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of ten (10)” to mean that the jury intended the punishment to be ten years in the penitentiary.

We had this identical question presented us in Slaughter v. State, 170 Tex.Cr.R. 16, 336…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bumpass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  3. Slaughter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
  4. McCarty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ainsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  2. Chase v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Barry v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API