Ainsworth v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of rape. The punishment was assessed by the jury at thirty years.
In the first ground of error, appellant contends that the judgment is void because the verdict at the punishment stage is indefinite and uncertain. The jury returned the following verdict at the punishment stage of the trial:
“The defendant, Lyndoll Lener Ains-worth, having been found guilty of rape as charged in the indictment, We, the Jury, assess his punishment at confinement in the Department of Corrections for the State of Texas for a period of 30_”
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bumpass v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Aldridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1968
- Gatlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Rose v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1986
- Boudreaux v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1986
- Batten v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Tapley v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1984
- Richardson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1987
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.