Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 21, 1977No. SC 1709Published

1Opinion of the Court

MADDOX, Justice.

This case has been here before. Many of the facts surrounding the dispute are set out in Rogers v. Smith, 287 Ala. 118, 248 So.2d 713, decided May 27, 1971, and will not be restated here.

After remandment, John, Joseph and Joyce Fisher, who were determined to be necessary parties to the reformation suit, in Rogers v. Smith, supra, filed an action of ejectment in October, 1973, against Alfred Smith, and others (Smith’s grantees and grantees’ mortgagee). The trial court, after hearing testimony, found, as follows:

“This Court does not ordinarily explain the reason for its ruling…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rogers v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1971
  2. Ray v. FowlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API