Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 27, 1971No. 4 Div. 386PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEFLIN, Chief Justice.

The question involved in this appeal is the following: Where á deed reformation suit has a jurisdictional defect due to the absence of necessary parties, can this defect be first raised in an appeal from a final decree involving a bill in the nature of a bill of review which seeks to review the final decree in said deed reformation suit on other grounds? This Court says yes.

This is an appeal from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Covington County, Alabama, in Equity, denying relief to Henry Rogers (appellant-complainant) on his “bill in the nature of a bill of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
  3. Batre v. Auze's heirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  4. McMaken v. McMakenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
  5. Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Stamps v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
  2. JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Payne v. Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  5. Chunchula Energy Corp. v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API