Rogers v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HEFLIN, Chief Justice.
The question involved in this appeal is the following: Where á deed reformation suit has a jurisdictional defect due to the absence of necessary parties, can this defect be first raised in an appeal from a final decree involving a bill in the nature of a bill of review which seeks to review the final decree in said deed reformation suit on other grounds? This Court says yes.
This is an appeal from a final decree of the Circuit Court of Covington County, Alabama, in Equity, denying relief to Henry Rogers (appellant-complainant) on his “bill in the nature of a bill of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Prout v. HogeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- City of Mobile v. Gulf Development Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Batre v. Auze's heirsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
- McMaken v. McMakenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Farrell v. FarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stamps v. Jefferson County Bd. of Educ.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1994
- JC Jacobs Banking Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1981
- Neal v. NealSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Payne v. Department of Industrial RelationsCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Chunchula Energy Corp. v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.